The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale demonstrated good interitem reliability (Cronbach's α=0.89) and validity for measuring shock-related anxiety in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Cross-Sectional (n=443)
Is the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) a reliable and valid measure of shock-related anxiety in ICD patients?
The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale is a reliable and valid single-factor instrument for assessing shock-related anxiety in ICD patients.
BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduces mortality in patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias via high energy shock. The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) was developed to measure ICD patient shock-related anxiety. Initial psychometric evaluation revealed good reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometrics of the FSAS in a large US sample of ICD patients. METHODS: Participants were recruited via e-mail and the survey was completed online. Ultimately, 443 ICD patients (359 male and 421 White) completed the 10-item FSAS. RESULTS: Means for FSAS were comparable to previously published data (M = 15.18, SD = 6.5). Interitem reliability was good (Cronbach's α= 0.89). The FSAS was negatively correlated with single-item measures of emotional well-being (r =-0.378, P < 0.01), sense of security (r =-0.365, P < 0.01), perceived general health (r =-0.185, P < 0.01), and quality of life (r =-0.216, P < .01), demonstrating discriminant validity. Convergent validity was supported through significant correlations with number of shocks (r = 0.464, P < 0.01) and reported disruptiveness of shock (r = 0.484, P < 0.01). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a single (second-order) factor model (χ(2) 34 = 75.34, P < 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.98, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.05) had the best fit. CONCLUSIONS: Shock anxiety as a construct can be measured in a reliable and valid method by the FSAS. These nationally representative data suggest that a single score for shock anxiety is an easy to use and appropriate method of assessment.
Ford et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) shock anxiety (n=443). Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) was evaluated on Psychometric properties including factor structure, reliability, and validity of the FSAS. The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale demonstrated good interitem reliability (Cronbach's α=0.89) and validity for measuring shock-related anxiety in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: