Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Therapy resistance and tumour relapse after drug therapy are commonly explained by Darwinian selection of pre-existing drug-resistant, often stem-like cancer cells resulting from random mutations. However, the ubiquitous non-genetic heterogeneity and plasticity of tumour cell phenotype raises the question: are mutations really necessary and sufficient to promote cell phenotype changes during tumour progression? Cancer therapy inevitably spares some cancer cells, even in the absence of resistant mutants. Accumulating observations suggest that the non-killed, residual tumour cells actively acquire a new phenotype simply by exploiting their developmental potential. These surviving cells are stressed by the cytotoxic treatment, and owing to phenotype plasticity, exhibit a variety of responses. Some are pushed into nearby, latent attractor states of the gene regulatory network which resemble evolutionary ancient or early developmental gene expression programs that confer stemness and resilience. By entering such stem-like, stress-response states, the surviving cells strengthen their capacity to cope with future noxious agents. Considering non-genetic cell state dynamics and the relative ease with which surviving but stressed cells can be tipped into latent attractors provides a foundation for exploring new therapeutic approaches that seek not only to kill cancer cells but also to avoid promoting resistance and relapse that are inherently linked to the attempts to kill them.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pisco et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c1254d48675e49423324a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.146
Angela Oliveira Pisco
Institute for Systems Biology
Sui Huang
University of Eastern Finland
British Journal of Cancer
University of Manchester
Institute for Systems Biology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...