No clinical study data is present in the provided text, which consists only of journal editorial board information.
Atrial fibrillation
In this executive summary of a Consensus Document from the European Heart Rhythm Association, endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, we comprehensively review the published evidence and propose a consensus on bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The main aim of the document was to summarise 'best practice' in dealing with bleeding risk in AF patients when approaching antithrombotic therapy, by addressing the epidemiology and size of the problem, and review established bleeding risk factors. We also summarise definitions of bleeding in the published literature. Patient values and preferences balancing the risk of bleeding against thromboembolism as well as the prognostic implications of bleeding are reviewed. We also provide an overview of published bleeding risk stratification and bleeding risk schema. Brief discussion of special situations (e.g. periablation, peri-devices such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators ICD or pacemakers, presentation with acute coronary syndromes and/or requiring percutanous coronary interventions/stents and bridging therapy) is made, as well as a discussion of the prevention of bleeds and managing bleeding complications. Finally, this document puts forwards consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist in everyday clinical practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Laurent Fauchier
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours
Elaine M. Hylek
Preventive Cardiology
E. Knight
Yale University
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
University College London
University of Amsterdam
University of Birmingham
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fauchier et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Atrial fibrillation. No clinical study data is present in the provided text, which consists only of journal editorial board information.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08c8c5865c3eaa9b01e9dc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1160/th11-10-0690
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: