Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Implementation occurs as a ‘late’ part in the stages model of the policy process. As such, it is seen as following upon and subordinate to the preceding stages of agenda-setting and policy formation. Hence, implementation is often addressed as ‘the rest’. This view on implementation as a presupposed residual in goal achievement implies little attention to ‘political’ dimensions, like ambiguity and conflict. Therefore, the view can only partially explain the – sometimes disappointing – results of policy processes. Alternatively, approaches to the policy/implementation nexus with an explicit focus on what happens at the street level have a greater explanatory potential. They are not taking implementation for granted as a seemingly technical matter, simply prescribed by policy objectives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Hupe
Michael J. Hill
Public Policy and Administration
Erasmus University Rotterdam
University of Brighton
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hupe et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc923ca5c75be4cfe530cd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715598828