Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Achieving balance between convergence and diversity is a key issue in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Most existing methodologies, which have demonstrated their niche on various practical problems involving two and three objectives, face significant challenges in many-objective optimization. This paper suggests a unified paradigm, which combines dominance- and decomposition-based approaches, for many-objective optimization. Our major purpose is to exploit the merits of both dominance- and decomposition-based approaches to balance the convergence and diversity of the evolutionary process. The performance of our proposed method is validated and compared with four state-of-the-art algorithms on a number of unconstrained benchmark problems with up to 15 objectives. Empirical results fully demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method on all considered test instances. In addition, we extend this method to solve constrained problems having a large number of objectives. Compared to two other recently proposed constrained optimizers, our proposed method shows highly competitive performance on all the constrained optimization problems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ke Li
South China Agricultural University
Kalyanmoy Deb
American International University-Bangladesh
Qingfu Zhang
City University of Hong Kong
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Michigan State University
City University of Hong Kong
City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15302e5347fbb1739f5f2a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2014.2373386
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: