Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using computer databases of scientific papers in physics, biomedical research, and computer science, we have constructed networks of collaboration between scientists in each of these disciplines. In these networks two scientists are considered connected if they have coauthored one or more papers together. Here we study a variety of nonlocal statistics for these networks, such as typical distances between scientists through the network, and measures of centrality such as closeness and betweenness. We further argue that simple networks such as these cannot capture variation in the strength of collaborative ties and propose a measure of collaboration strength based on the number of papers coauthored by pairs of scientists, and the number of other scientists with whom they coauthored those papers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. E. J. Newman
Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics
Cornell University
Santa Fe Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. E. J. Newman (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a2da436c3abab504648a2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.64.016132