Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The conclusions drawn from fisheries stock assessment models can depend strongly on the relative weights assigned to different data sets. However, there is no consensus amongst practitioners as to the best approach to data weighting. From a discussion of some key questions concerning data weighting in stock assessment models, I draw three guiding principles: (i) do not let other data stop the model from fitting abundance data well; (ii) when weighting age or length composition data, allow for correlations; and (iii) do not down-weight abundance data because they may be unrepresentative. I propose an approach to data weighting based on these principles. Two factors that complicate this approach are that some decisions are inevitably subjective (which underlines the need for expert knowledge in stock assessment), and some technical problems are unresolved.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. I. C. C. Francis
Statistics New Zealand
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. I. C. C. Francis (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ffa5b1517a826fb04c602 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f2011-025