Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: To compare standard and intensive treatment strategies for patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of poor prognosis, defined by the international prognostic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients received standard chemotherapy with 11 weeks of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, prednisolone, and methotrexate (VAPEC-B), and 33 received intensive treatment with 7 weeks of VAPEC-B, three cycles of ifosfamide/cytarabine, then high-dose busulfan/cyclophosphamide followed by autologous blood progenitor-cell (BPC) transplantation. RESULTS: Twelve of 33 patients in the intensive group and 26 of 34 patients in the standard group have died. The median follow-up time for the surviving patients is 31 months and 68 months, respectively. At 2 years, the actuarial estimates of event-free survival (EFS) were 61% versus 35% (P = .01) and of overall survival, 64% versus 35% (P = .01). A significant reduction in the event rate (progression or death) was maintained after adjustment for age and the number of risk factors. The estimated risk of experiencing an event was 0.37 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.16 to 0.84) in the intensive group compared with the standard group. CONCLUSION: Patients with poor prognostic features who received high-dose therapy and BPC rescue had a superior EFS. The survival differences observed in this study justify a formal comparison in a randomized study.
Pettengell et al. (Thu,) studied this question.