Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We document the development of a suite of carbonate mineral reference materials for calibrating SIMS determinations of δ 18 O in samples with compositions along the dolomite–ankerite solid solution series CaMg( CO 3 ) 2 –CaFe( CO 3 ) 2 . Under routine operating conditions for the analysis of carbonates for δ 18 O with a CAMECA IMS 1280 instrument (at Wisc SIMS , University of Wisconsin‐Madison), the magnitude of instrumental bias along the dolomite–ankerite series decreased exponentially by ~ 10‰ with increasing Fe content in the dolomite structure, but appeared insensitive to minor Mn substitution < 2.6 mol% Mn/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Mn). The compositional dependence of bias (i.e., the sample matrix effect) was calibrated using the Hill equation, which relates bias to the Fe# of dolomite–ankerite i.e., molar Fe/(Mg+Fe) for thirteen reference materials (Fe# = 0.004–0.789); for calibrations employing either 10 or 3 μm diameter spot size measurements, this yielded residual values ≤ 0.3–0.4‰ relative to CRM NBS 19 for most reference materials in the suite. Analytical precision was ± 0.3‰ (2 s , standard deviations) for 10‐μm spots and ± 0.7‰ (2 s ) for 3‐μm spots, based on the spot‐to‐spot repeatability of a drift monitor material that ‘bracketed’ each set of ten sample‐spot analyses. Analytical uncertainty for individual sample analyses was approximated by a combination of precision and calibration residual values (propagated in quadrature), suggesting an uncertainty of ± 0.5‰ (2 s ) for 10‐μm spots and ± 1‰ (2 s ) for 3‐μm spots.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maciej G. Śliwiński
Kouki Kitajima
Reinhard Kozdon
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
NASA Astrobiology Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Śliwiński et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df4d22de200760a8614ee5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00364.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: