Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The heterogeneity of the chILD group of disorders, different determinations of what constitutes a chILD disorder and, a paucity of large epidemiological studies precludes consolidation of results across studies. Consensus on chILD classification is needed to support diagnosis and allow direct comparisons of research evidence. Active disease surveillance and international patient registries are required to advance understanding and management of chILD.
Hime et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: