Compared to high education, low educational level was significantly associated with poor cardiovascular health status (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.24-3.01).
Cross-Sectional (n=4,165)
Is socioeconomic status (measured by education) associated with cardiovascular health indices in adults?
Lower educational levels are significantly associated with poorer cardiovascular health profiles, highlighting the need for targeted prevention strategies in these groups.
Odds Ratio: 1.93 (95% CI 1.24–3.01)
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular health (CVH) is a relatively new concept defined by the American Heart Association (AHA). The aim of the present study was to assess whether the indices of CVH were discriminators of socioeconomic status (SES) in the adult population of the Republic of Srpska (RS). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: RS, Bosnia and Herzegovina. PARTICIPANTS: The study involved 4165 adults aged ≥18 years (mean age 50.2; 54% women) who participated in the National Health Survey performed from September to November 2010 in the RS. STUDY VARIABLES: Participant's education was a proxy for SES. Potential discriminators of SES were indices of CVH presented according to AHA as: ideal health behaviours index (non-smoking, body mass index <25 kg/m(2), physical activity at goal level and healthy diet); ideal health factors index (untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL, untreated blood pressure <120/<80 mm Hg, untreated fasting glucose <100 mg/dL and non-smoking); and ideal CVH status (defined as all seven ideal health metrics present) versus intermediate and poor CVH status. RESULTS: Participants with high educational levels had a significantly greater number of ideal CVH metrics, and ideal health factor metrics compared with those with low or medium educational level (OR 0.88 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99 and OR 0.88 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.69 to 0.96 and OR 0.77 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87; respectively). The number of ideal behaviour metrics was not a discriminator of educational groups. Concerning the categories of CVH status the poor CVH was a discriminator for low and medium education compared with those with high education (OR 1.93 95% CI 1.24 to 3.01 and OR 1.54 95% CI 1.08 to 2.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasise the large potential for preventing cardiovascular disease, showing a low proportion with a favourable CVH profile, especially among low-educated people. It is necessary to consider prevention strategies aimed at improving CVH in RS, targeting primarily low educational groups.
Janković et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health (n=4,165). Low educational level vs. High educational level was evaluated on Poor cardiovascular health (CVH) status (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.01). Compared to high education, low educational level was significantly associated with poor cardiovascular health status (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.24-3.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: