Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Over the last several years a number of leading philosophers – including Catherine Elgin, Linda Zagzebski, Jonathan Kvanvig, and Duncan Pritchard – have grown increasingly dissatisfied with the contemporary focus on knowledge in epistemology and have attempted to “recover” the notion of understanding. According to some of these philosophers, in fact, understanding deserves not just to be recovered, but to supplant knowledge as the focus of epistemological inquiry. This entry considers some of the main reasons why philosophers have taken understanding to be more valuable than knowledge, focusing on claims that it is more transparent, that it better reflects or mirrors the world, and that it is a greater intellectual achievement.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stephen R. Grimm (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c03449545a83bbee4ace — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x
Stephen R. Grimm
Philosophy Compass
Fordham University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: