Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ian James Kidd
Havi Carel
Journal of Applied Philosophy
University of Bristol
University of Nottingham
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kidd et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8da682c87b79b92d17e9c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: