Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This brief communication presents preliminary findings on automated T witter accounts distributing links to scientific articles deposited on the preprint repository ar X iv. It discusses the implication of the presence of such bots from the perspective of social media metrics (altmetrics), where mentions of scholarly documents on T witter have been suggested as a means of measuring impact that is both broader and timelier than citations. Our results show that automated T witter accounts create a considerable amount of tweets to scientific articles and that they behave differently than common social bots, which has critical implications for the use of raw tweet counts in research evaluation and assessment. We discuss some definitions of T witter cyborgs and bots in scholarly communication and propose distinguishing between different levels of engagement—that is, differentiating between tweeting only bibliographic information to discussing or commenting on the content of a scientific work.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stefanie Haustein
Timothy D. Bowman
Kim Holmberg
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Université de Montréal
Indiana University Bloomington
University of Turku
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haustein et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69de9f6240ea065679558dbb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23456