Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The impact of geostationary clear‐sky radiances (CSRs) on 4D‐Var wind analyses has been investigated by running a set of observing system experiments. Analysis scores have been calculated to measure the ability of individual satellite datasets to improve the wind analysis, starting from a no‐satellite baseline. In this context, the assimilation of CSRs from the two water‐vapour channels on Meteosat‐9 has been found to improve the wind analysis throughout the troposphere, with the strongest signal at 300 and 500 hPa. Indeed, for the Northern Hemisphere and the Tropics, the CSR impact at these levels exceeds that of the Meteosat‐9 atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs), the sampling of the latter in the assimilation being rather limited. Conversely, the impact of AMVs exceeds that of CSRs in the lower troposphere, where the latter provide very little direct information. This demonstrates the complementarity of the two datasets in the operational 4D‐Var wind analysis. The mechanisms through which the assimilation of CSRs can impact wind analyses have been isolated. The dominant effect is that of humidity‐tracer advection, by which the wind field is adjusted in order to fit observed humidity features via the minimization of the 4D‐Var cost function. Other mechanisms, such as balance constraints and the cycling of the forecast model that links the humidity and wind variables, have been found to play a minor role. The benefit of having frequent CSR images within the assimilation window has also been demonstrated. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carole Peubey
A. P. McNally
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peubey et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a081570113ba5b476ddf2fd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.500