Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Neoliberal theory rationalizes inequality as both 1) necessary for growth and 2) offset by a trickle down to lower income groups. However, benefits from income growth failed to reach most of the population for the last several decades in the United States. Instead, a negative trickle down has lowered many people's wellbeing. The first aspect of negative trickle down is a new form of Veblen's conspicuous consumption with positional goods. The second is the effect on the provision of public goods. The third is the competition for limited resources, such as housing. We review how greater income inequality contributes to each.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daphne T. Greenwood
ORCID
Richard Holt
De Montfort University
Journal of Economic Issues
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Southern Oregon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Greenwood et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0da3a4389a567298ba96b6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/jei0021-3624440212