Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Pressure measured with a cuff and sphygmomanometer in the brachial artery is accepted as an important predictor of future cardiovascular risk. However, systolic pressure varies throughout the arterial tree, such that aortic (central) systolic pressure is actually lower than corresponding brachial values, although this difference is highly variable between individuals. Emerging evidence now suggests that central pressure is better related to future cardiovascular events than is brachial pressure. Moreover, anti-hypertensive drugs can exert differential effects on brachial and central pressure. Therefore, basing treatment decisions on central, rather than brachial pressure, is likely to have important implications for the future diagnosis and management of hypertension. Such a paradigm shift will, however, require further, direct evidence that selectively targeting central pressure, brings added benefit, over and above that already provided by brachial artery pressure.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carmel M. McEniery
Vascular Medicine
John R. Cockcroft
Preventive Cardiology
Mary J. Roman
Cardiac Imaging
European Heart Journal
University of Cambridge
University of California, Irvine
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
McEniery et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5720c75589c71d767e424 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht565