Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Across four experiments, the authors find that when information pertaining to the assessment of the healthiness of food items is provided, the less healthy the item is portrayed to be, (1) the better is its inferred taste, (2) the more it is enjoyed during actual consumption, and (3) the greater is the preference for it in choice tasks when a hedonic goal is more (versus less) salient. The authors obtain these effects both among consumers who report that they believe that healthiness and tastiness are negatively correlated and, to a lesser degree, among those who do not report such a belief. The authors also provide evidence that the association between the concepts of “unhealthy” and “tasty” operates at an implicit level. The authors discuss possibilities for controlling the effect of the unhealthy = tasty intuition (and its potential for causing negative health consequences), including controlling the volume of unhealthy but tasty food eaten, changing unhealthy foods to make them less unhealthy but still tasty, and providing consumers with better information about what constitutes “healthy.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rajagopal Raghunathan
The University of Texas at Austin
Rebecca Walker Naylor
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Wayne D. Hoyer
Systems & Processes Engineering Corporation (United States)
Journal of Marketing
The University of Texas at Austin
University of South Carolina
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Raghunathan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6f508e328128020aa8934 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.170