Cardiovascular reactions to low-demand standardized tasks significantly predicted ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate during the working day, independent of baseline, age, gender, and body mass.
Observational (n=162)
Do reactions to standardized tasks predict ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in everyday life?
Laboratory-field associations of cardiovascular activity depend in part on the congruence of stressfulness and physical activity level in the two situations.
Associations between cardiovascular stress reactivity and blood pressure and heart rate recorded in everyday life were hypothesized to depend on the stressfulness of the ambulatory monitoring period relative to standardized tasks and on activity levels at the time of measurement. One hundred two female and 60 male school teachers carried out high- and low-demand tasks under standardized conditions and ambulatory monitoring during the working day. Stress ratings during the day were close to those recorded during the low-demand task. Reactions to the low-demand task were significant predictors of ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate independent of baseline, age, gender, and body mass. Associations were more consistent for ambulatory recordings taken when participants were seated than when they were standing and when the ambulatory monitoring day was considered to be as stressful as usual or more stressful than usual, and not less stressful than usual. Laboratory-field associations of cardiovascular activity depend in part on the congruence of stressfulness and physical activity level in the 2 situations.
Steptoe et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Healthy volunteers (n=162). Standardized high- and low-demand tasks was evaluated on Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate. Cardiovascular reactions to low-demand standardized tasks significantly predicted ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate during the working day, independent of baseline, age, gender, and body mass.