Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: The relationship of fine particulate matter < 2.5 microm in diameter (PM(2.5)) air pollution with mortality and cardiovascular disease is well established, with more recent long-term studies reporting larger effect sizes than earlier long-term studies. Some studies have suggested the coarse fraction, particles between 2.5 and 10 microm (PM(10-2.5)), may also be important. With respect to mortality and cardiovascular events, questions remain regarding the relative strength of effect sizes for chronic exposure to fine and coarse particles. OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship of chronic PM(2.5) and PM(10-2.5) exposures with all-cause mortality and fatal and nonfatal incident coronary heart disease (CHD), adjusting for time-varying covariates. METHODS: The current study included women from the Nurses' Health Study living in metropolitan areas of the northeastern and midwestern United States. Follow-up was from 1992 to 2002. We used geographic information systems-based spatial smoothing models to estimate monthly exposures at each participant's residence. RESULTS: We found increased risk of all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.54 and fatal CHD (HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.07-3.78) associated with each 10-microg/m(3) increase in annual PM(2.5) exposure. The association between fatal CHD and PM(10-2.5) was weaker. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contribute to growing evidence that chronic PM(2.5) exposure is associated with risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robin Puett
University of Maryland, College Park
Jaime E. Hart
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jeff D. Yanosky
Pennsylvania State University
Environmental Health Perspectives
Harvard University
University of California, Berkeley
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Puett et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08accc9a6c4ba6e610c9c5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900572
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: