Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual model of fairness applicable to buyer‐ supplier relationships within supply chains in order to generate a new line of empirical research within supply chain management (SCM). Design/methodology/approach The paper presents a literature review on organisational justice drawn from the psychology discipline. Fairness within collaborative and long‐term buyer‐supplier relationships is discussed and conceptualised. A number of propositions are presented applicable to buyer supplier relationships within supply chains, given that successful implementation of supply chain strategies depends upon the actions and reactions of individuals across functions, both within and between organisations. Findings Some of the assumptions made in the traditional intra‐organisational setting are challenged. A conceptual model of fairness applicable to buyer‐supplier relationships is developed, and supply chain moderating factors that may impact on perceptions of justice, and possible desired organisational as well as supply chain outcomes are identified. Originality/value Specifically, a contribution is made to the gaps in the SCM literature on the social implications of SCM by developing a behavioural theoretical approach. Solutions to operational measurement difficulties are offered, together with implications for practising managers to consider when managing supply chain relationships. Opportunities and difficulties for future empirical research are also identified.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sue Hornibrook
University of Kent
Andrew Fearne
University of East Anglia
Maria Lazzarin
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
University of Kent
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hornibrook et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dfee5c915fa04953615383 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550910975826
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: