Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The Shroud of Turin, although carbon-dated between 1260 and 1390 C.E., is believed by many to be the real burial cloth of Jesus on the basis of other evidence. Part of the controversy arises from the fact that it has proven very difficult to explain just how the image was generated and to achieve a good imitation of the Shroud by simple means. The faint image of a crucified man has pseudonegative properties, is superficial, contains three-dimensional information and consists of a discoloration of the top cellulose fibers of the linen. The authors present now a simple technique, which may explain how the image could have originated from the work of a medieval artist. Furthermore, the authors were able to obtain a good replica of the Shroud of Turin at a 1:1 scale that possesses all the above-mentioned features and the same visual and spectroscopic properties as the original.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luigi Garlaschelli (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a029ba6cab5b316e39e1f9b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2010.54.4.040301
Luigi Garlaschelli
University of Siena
Journal of Imaging Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: