Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We describe a set of two computer‐implemented models that solve physics problems in ways characteristic of more and less competent human solvers. The main features accounting for different competences are differences in strategy for selecting physics principles, and differences in the degree of automation in the process of applying a single principle. The models provide a good account of the order in which principles are applied by human solvers working problems in kinematics and dynamics. They also are sufficiently flexible to allow easy extension to several related domains of physics problems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jill H. Larkin
John McDermott
Dorothea P. Simon
Cognitive Science
Carnegie Mellon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Larkin et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a096b9559b902245b45be65 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0404_1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: