Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The authors present the results of 593 consecutive and non-selected patients who underwent direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation in the period September 1981 to December 1988. The results are compared with 3086 patients who underwent conventional bypass surgery over the same period of time. The ages varied from 33 to 80 years (mean = 56) with 40 patients older than 70. The overall mortality in the group without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was 1.7% (10/593) compared with 3.8% for conventional revascularization. Our mortality in the last 3 years has been 0.5% and 0% in the last 203 patients revascularized without CPB. The number of grafts varied from 1 to 5 (average 1.6). The treated arteries were: anterior descending (557), right (282) marginal (5) and circumflex marginal (4). Immediate postoperative complications were fewer and hospital discharge was earlier in the group treated without CPB. The authors conclude that this tactical alternative has the advantages of: lower morbidity and mortality, lower cost and no need for blood transfusion. Drawbacks are the need for greater technical expertise and it seems to be possible in about 19% of all patients who undergo myocardial revascularization.
Buffolo et al. (1990) studied this question.