A structured Gothenburg person-centred care approach increased notifications to home care services (33.8% vs 12.1%) and reduced days in hospital ready for discharge (11 vs 35) compared to usual care.
Does a structured Gothenburg person-centred care (gPCC) approach improve efficiency in discharge procedures in patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure?
A structured person-centered care approach significantly improves discharge efficiency and reduces hospital days ready for discharge in patients with worsening chronic heart failure.
Absolute Event Rate: 33.8% vs 12.1%
BACKGROUND: Discharge planning is important to bridge the gap between hospital and home. Many patients with chronic heart failure are often fragile elderly with co-morbidities and functional decline due to increased symptom burden. A structured Gothenburg person-centred care (gPCC) approach may promote better discharge-planning. AIMS: To evaluate whether proactive care-planning based on the gPCC model leads to improved efficiency in discharge procedures compared with usual care in patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure. METHODS: In a controlled before-and-after design, patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure were assigned to either a usual care group or a gPCC intervention group. The patients' social situation, their discharge destination and the number of days until the discharge were recorded. The time interval (in days) between notification and start of coordination of care was recorded. RESULTS: In total, 248 patients were included, 123 in the usual care group and 125 in the gPCC intervention. During hospitalization, notifications to the community home help service and/or round-the-clock home nursing care services were more frequent in the gPCC-group (33.8%) compared with patients in the usual care group (12.1%). A confirmed discharge planning conference started within the first five days in the gPCC group whereas the usual care group ranged from one to 28 days. Compared with the usual care group, the gPCC group had fewer days in hospital (11 versus 35) ready for discharge. CONCLUSION: gPCC improves discharge processes because patients are viewed as competent to be involved in planning their subsequent care.
Ulin et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in worsening chronic heart failure (n=248). Gothenburg person-centred care (gPCC) vs. usual care was evaluated on notifications to the community home help service and/or round-the-clock home nursing care services. A structured Gothenburg person-centred care approach increased notifications to home care services (33.8% vs 12.1%) and reduced days in hospital ready for discharge (11 vs 35) compared to usual care.