Each standard deviation increase in intrathoracic fat was associated with higher odds of prevalent coronary artery calcium (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.54-9.58; P=0.004), whereas pericardial fat was not.
Cohort (n=600)
Are pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes associated with the presence, severity, and progression of coronary artery calcium in individuals without known cardiovascular disease?
Intrathoracic fat, but not pericardial fat, is significantly associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcium, suggesting they should be considered separate entities in cardiovascular risk assessment.
Effect estimate: OR 3.84 (95% CI 1.54-9.58)
p-value: p=0.004
OBJECTIVE: Body mass index (BMI) may not accurately or adequately reflect body composition or its role in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Ectopic adipose depots may provide a more refined representation of the role of adiposity in CVD. Thus, the association of pericardial and intra-thoracic fat with coronary artery calcium (CAC) was examined. DESIGN AND METHODS: Nearly 600 white men and women, as well as Filipina women and African-American women, all without known CVD, had abdominal and chest computed tomography (CT) scans at two time points about 4 years apart from which CAC presence, severity and progression, as well as pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes were obtained. Logistic and linear regression models with staged adjustment were used to assess associations of pericardial and intra-thoracic fat with CAC presence, severity, and progression. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, BMI, sex/ethnic group, ever smoking, and lipids, each standard deviation higher increment of intra-thoracic fat, but not pericardial fat, was significantly associated with 3.84-fold higher odds of prevalent CAC (95% CI (1.54, 9.58), P = 0.004) and a 38.4% higher CAC score (95% CI (3.5%, 90.0%), P = 0.03). Neither pericardial nor intrathoracic fat were associated with CAC progression. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous reports, pericardial fat was not associated with the presence, severity or progression of CAC. However, a significant association between intrathoracic fat and both the presence and severity of CAC was demonstrated. Studies measuring fat in the thoracic cavity may consider defining intrathoracic fat as a separate entity from pericardial fat.
Wassel et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in No known cardiovascular disease (n=600). Intrathoracic and pericardial fat volumes was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) (OR 3.84, 95% CI 1.54-9.58, p=0.004). Each standard deviation increase in intrathoracic fat was associated with higher odds of prevalent coronary artery calcium (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.54-9.58; P=0.004), whereas pericardial fat was not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: