Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Conventional physics laboratory courses generally include an emphasis on increasing students' ability to carry out data analysis according to scientific practice, in particular, those aspects that relate to measurement uncertainty. This study evaluates the efficacy of the conventional approach by analyzing the understanding of measurement of freshmen following the physics major sequence, i.e., top achievers, with regard to data collection, data processing, and data comparison, through pre- and postinstruction tests by using an established instrument. The findings show that the laboratory course improved the performance of the majority of students insofar as the more mechanical aspects of data collection and data processing were concerned. However, only about 20% of the cohort of physics majors exhibited a deeper understanding of measurement uncertainty required for data comparison.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Trevor Volkwyn
Uppsala University
Saalih Allie
University of Cape Town
Andy Buffler
University of Cape Town
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
University of York
University of Cape Town
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Volkwyn et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16d780c7240d1a707baf48 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.4.010108
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: