A medical information management system reduced postoperative respiratory complications compared to controls (8.4% vs. 16.1%) in high-risk surgical patients.
RCT (n=519)
Does a medical information management system improve preoperative respiratory care and reduce postoperative respiratory complications in high-risk surgical patients?
Implementation of a medical information management system significantly improves preoperative respiratory care and reduces postoperative respiratory complications in high-risk surgical patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 8.4% vs 16.1%
We designed a medical information management (MIM) system to 1) identify high-risk patients (with cardiopulmonary dysfunction or undergoing major surgery), and 2) augment traditional mechanisms for referring high-risk patients to respiratory specialists. We define MIM as the combination of techniques that solicit, record, transfer, analyze, and distribute patient data according to designated protocols. A randomized trial compared 247 control subjects with 272 surgical patients assisted by information management. Data analysis focused on patients with cardiopulmonary impairment. The results showed that the MIM assisted patients received (1) more preoperative respiratory assessments (83.2 per cent vs. 9.2 per cent) than controls, 2) more preoperative respiratory therapy (37.9 per cent vs. 8.0 per cent) and 3) fewer postoperative respiratory complications (8.4 per cent vs. 16.1 per cent) than controls. These findings suggest that a MIM system can be an effective auxiliary mechanism for improving presurgical care.
Chase et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in High-risk surgical patients with cardiopulmonary dysfunction (n=519). Medical information management (MIM) system vs. Control was evaluated on Postoperative respiratory complications. A medical information management system reduced postoperative respiratory complications compared to controls (8.4% vs. 16.1%) in high-risk surgical patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: