Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract In this afterword I consider a set of questions related to the research agendas of race in International Relations. What are our narratives of race and racism? Whom do we follow in order to tell the tale: the masters or the enslaved—the humanitarians or the ‘sufferers’? And which tale confesses the episteme—the scientifically valid study—of race? Notes 1 I use this Anglo-Caribbean term to refer to those whose ancestors suffered slavery and colonization and who, in their present socio-economic and psychological state, still suffer from the legacies of that. For more context, see Bogues (Citation2009). 2 On the intellectual politics regarding the two statements of 1950 and 1951 see Selcer (Citation2012). 3 See the symposium ‘Decolonizing the Cold War/Be.Bop 2013. Black Europe Body Politics’, Berlin, 2013, . 4 On this point see Simon Gikandi's (Citation2002) critique of Paul Gilroy humanism.
Robbie Shilliam (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: