Pharmacist-led monitoring (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.41) and appropriate patient selection (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.25) were associated with better dabigatran adherence.
Observational (n=4,863)
Yes
Effect estimate: RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.11-1.41)
Absolute Event Rate: 77% vs 65%
IMPORTANCE: Unlike warfarin, which requires routine laboratory testing and dose adjustment, target-specific oral anticoagulants like dabigatran do not. However, optimal follow-up infrastructure and modifiable site-level factors associated with improved adherence to dabigatran are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess site-level variation in dabigatran adherence and to identify site-level practices associated with higher dabigatran adherence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Mixed-methods study involving retrospective quantitative and cross-sectional qualitative data. A total of 67 Veterans Health Administration sites with 20 or more patients filling dabigatran prescriptions between 2010 and 2012 for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were sampled (4863 total patients; median, 51 patients per site). Forty-seven pharmacists from 41 eligible sites participated in the qualitative inquiry. EXPOSURE: Site-level practices identified included appropriate patient selection, pharmacist-driven patient education, and pharmacist-led adverse event and adherence monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Dabigatran adherence (intensity of drug use during therapy) defined by proportion of days covered (ratio of days supplied by prescription to follow-up duration) of 80% or more. RESULTS: The median proportion of patients adherent to dabigatran was 74% (interquartile range IQR, 66%-80%). After multivariable adjustment, dabigatran adherence across sites varied by a median odds ratio of 1.57. Review of practices across participating sites showed that appropriate patient selection was performed at 31 sites, pharmacist-led education was provided at 30 sites, and pharmacist-led monitoring at 28 sites. The proportion of adherent patients was higher at sites performing appropriate selection (75% vs 69%), education (76% vs 66%), and monitoring (77% vs 65%). Following multivariable adjustment, association between pharmacist-led education and dabigatran adherence was not statistically significant (relative risk RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.06). Appropriate patient selection (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25), and provision of pharmacist-led monitoring (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41) were associated with better patient adherence. Additionally, longer duration of monitoring and providing more intensive care to nonadherent patients in collaboration with the clinician improved adherence. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran, there was variability in patient medication adherence across Veterans Health Administration sites. Specific pharmacist-based activities were associated with greater patient adherence to dabigatran.
Shore et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=4,863). Pharmacist-led monitoring vs. No pharmacist-led monitoring was evaluated on Dabigatran adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.41). Pharmacist-led monitoring (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.41) and appropriate patient selection (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.25) were associated with better dabigatran adherence.