Does screening for microalbuminuria and early ACE inhibitor treatment improve cost-effectiveness (QALYs) in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus compared to screening for hypertension and macroproteinuria?
Screening for microalbuminuria to prevent renal failure in insulin-dependent diabetics may not be cost-effective unless the test has high predictive value and early ACE inhibitor treatment significantly delays progression to macroproteinuria.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the conditions necessary to make screening for microalbuminuria in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus cost effective. DESIGN: This economic evaluation compared two strategies designed to prevent the development of end stage renal disease in patients with insulin dependent diabetes with disease for five years. Strategy A, screening for microalbuminuria as currently recommended, was compared with strategy B, a protocol in which patients were screened for hypertension and macroproteinuria. INTERVENTION: Patients identified in both strategies were treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. SETTING: Computer simulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Strategy costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The model predicted that strategy A would produce an additional 0. 00967 QALYs at a present value cost of 261. 53 (1990 US) per patient (or an incremental cost/QALY of 27, 041. 69) over strategy B. The incremental cost/QALY for strategy A over B was sensitive to several variables. If the positive predictive value of screening for microalbuminuria (impact of false label and unnecessary treatment) is 64% of patients demonstrate hypertension at the onset of microalbuminuria, then the incremental costs/QALY will exceed 75, 000. CONCLUSION: Whether microalbuminuria surveillance in this population is cost effective requires more information. Being aware of the costs, recommendation pitfalls, and gaps in our knowledge should help focus our efforts to provide cost effective care to this population.
Kiberd et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: