Photoplethysmography with digital filtering monitored heart and respiratory rates with a maximum error of 10 beats/min and 7 breaths/min compared to ECG and transthoracic impedance plethysmography.
Photoplethysmography (PPG) with digital filtering vs ECG and transthoracic impedance plethysmogram
Maximum error of heart and respiratory rates compared to conventional methods
An apparatus for simultaneously monitoring heart and respiratory rates was developed using photoplethysmography (PPG) and digital filters, and compared with conventional methods. The PPG signal, which includes both heart and respiratory components, was measured at the earlobe with an original transmission mode photoplethysmographic device. A digital filtering technique was used to distinguish heart and respiratory signals from the PPG signal. The cut-off frequency of the respiratory signal filter was selected automatically depending on the heart rate. Using digital filtering techniques, heart and respiratory signals were separated at rest and during exercise. The digital signal processor was employed to realize an adaptive and real-time filtering. The heart rate was calculated by the zero-crossing method and the respiratory rate from the peak interval of the filtered signal. To evaluate the newly developed monitor, an ECG for heart rate and a transthoracic impedance plethysmogram for respiratory rate were monitored simultaneously. To obtain higher heart and respiratory rates, exercise was performed on an electrical bicycle ergometer. Heart and respiratory rates calculated by the new method compare to those obtained from ECG and the transthoracic impedance plethysmogram. The maximum error of heart and respiratory rates was 10 beats/min and 7 breaths/min, respectively.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koji Nakajima
University of Tokyo Hospital
T. Tamura
Waseda University
Hidetoshi Miike
Kanazawa University
Medical Engineering & Physics
Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Yamaguchi University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nakajima et al. (Mon,) reported a other. Photoplethysmography (PPG) with digital filtering vs. ECG and transthoracic impedance plethysmogram was evaluated on Maximum error of heart and respiratory rates compared to conventional methods. Photoplethysmography with digital filtering monitored heart and respiratory rates with a maximum error of 10 beats/min and 7 breaths/min compared to ECG and transthoracic impedance plethysmography.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22436d2221fd35d149361e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)00066-6