Repetitive extrastimulation allowed capture at progressively less complete repolarization levels (78.4% for S4 vs 85.5% for S2; P<0.01), leading to impaired impulse propagation and VT induction.
Observational (n=21)
p-value: p=<.0001
BACKGROUND: Although programmed electrical stimulation is widely used for provoking sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), the mechanism by which repetitive extrastimulation evokes VT is still little understood. Specifically, it is not clear why several closely coupled extrastimuli are frequently required to induce VT. Although regularly paced human ventricular myocardium exhibits a near constant relation between myocardial repolarization and refractoriness, the effect of repetitive extrastimulation on the relation between repolarization and excitability in the human heart and its relevance for arrhythmia induction by programmed stimulation are unknown. We hypothesized that the induction of VT by repetitive extrastimulation is facilitated by an altered relation between repolarization and refractoriness, and this leads to disturbances in ventricular impulse propagation, which trigger the onset of VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients undergoing routine electrophysiological study were paced from the right ventricular apex and outflow tract endocardium with monophasic action potential-pacing catheters placed at both sites simultaneously Monophasic action potential durations (APDs) and effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured simultaneously at each site, during regular stimulation (S1-S1) at 400-ms cycle length and during three consecutive extrastimuli (S2 through S4) at the closest coupling intervals at which all three extrastimuli still resulted in capture. Measurements further included the repolarization level at which the earliest capture occurred, the ratio between ERP and APD, and the propagation time between the pacing and distant recording site. APD and ERP both shortened progressively with each extrastimulus. APD at 90% repolarization decreased from a baseline (S1) of 238.1 +/- 19.7 ms by 14.9% at S2, 18.9% at S3, and 22.9% at S4 (P 16.6 +/- 1.8%) were present. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive extrastimulation not only shortens APD and subsequently ERP but also alters the ERP/APD relation by allowing capture to occur at progressively less complete repolarization levels. This progressive encroachment onto the preceding repolarization phase is associated with impaired impulse propagation and a high incidence of VT induction. This may help explain how repetitive, closely coupled extrastimulation induces ventricular tachycardia in the human heart.
Koller et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Patients undergoing routine electrophysiological study (n=21). Repetitive extrastimulation (S2-S4) vs. Regular stimulation (S1) was evaluated on Action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period (ERP) (p=<.0001). Repetitive extrastimulation allowed capture at progressively less complete repolarization levels (78.4% for S4 vs 85.5% for S2; P<0.01), leading to impaired impulse propagation and VT induction.