Cardiac resynchronization therapy may rarely potentiate ventricular arrhythmias in patients with chronic heart failure, necessitating strategies to predict its proarrhythmic potential.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy potentiate ventricular arrhythmias in patients with advanced chronic heart failure?
This review highlights the rare but potential proarrhythmic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy, emphasizing the need to systematically study and predict this risk as CRT indications expand.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established adjunctive treatment to optimal pharmacologic therapy in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF), diminished left ventricular (LV) function and intraventricular conduction delay. Although CRT has been shown to improve ventricular hemodynamics, quality of life and exercise capacity, there is some evidence that it may rarely potentiate ventricular arrhythmias. As CRT is considered for an expanded population of CHF patients, and left-sided pacing is considered as an option for pacemaker-indicated patients (potentially without defibrillator backup), the effect of these pacing modalities on the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia must be systematically studied and mechanistically understood. Strategies to prospectively predict the proarrhythmic potential of LV epicardial pacing need to be developed, and therapy accordingly individualized. This review attempts to summarize the current information on proarrhythmia in resynchronization therapy.
Basu‐Ray et al. (Thu,) conducted a review in Advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) with diminished LV function and intraventricular conduction delay. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmias / proarrhythmia. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may rarely potentiate ventricular arrhythmias in patients with chronic heart failure, necessitating strategies to predict its proarrhythmic potential.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: