Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Construct validity is one of the most central concepts in psychology. Researchers generally establish the construct validity of a measure by correlating it with a number of other measures and arguing from the pattern of correlations that the measure is associated with these variables in theoretically predictable ways. This article presents 2 simple metrics for quantifying construct validity that provide effect size estimates indicating the extent to which the observed pattem of correlations in a convergent-discriminant validity matrix matches the theoretically predicted pattern of correlations. Both measures, based on contrast analysis, provide simple estimates of validity that can be compared across studies, constructs, and measures meta-analytically, and can be implemented without the use of complex statistical procedures that may limit their accessibility.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Drew Westen
Emory University
Robert Rosenthal
University of California, Riverside
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Emory University
University of California, Riverside
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Westen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d99f27c7f0c3ae80a3e01e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.608
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: