Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The twin ideas of organizational learning and the learning organization have recently fired the imagination of many academics, consultants and practising managers. There is, however, a pressing need for empirical research to examine the origins and development of these closely related concepts. The qualitative research underpinning this paper was conducted over a three‐year period (1994–97) and involved detailed examination of organizational learning aspirations and practices within the UK operations of five major manufacturing companies. Sixty‐six interviewees were classified into three groups – strategy, human resources, and research and development – and the data gathered were analysed using the conceptually clustered matrix technique. This led to the identification of a set of six antecedents which together explain the rise to prominence of organizational learning. These six antecedents are: the shift in the relative importance of factors of production away from capital towards labour, particularly intellectual labour; the ever more rapid pace of change in the business environment; widespread acceptance of knowledge as a prime source of competitive advantage; the greater demands being placed on all businesses by customers; increasing dissatisfaction, among managers and employees, with the traditional, command‐and‐control, management paradigm; and the intensely competitive nature of global business. A model is unfolded which explains the ready acceptance and rise to prominence of the organizational learning phenomenon. A valuable feature of the model is that it demonstrates the interplay of thoughts and feelings between management practitioners and theorists.
Harvey et al. (1999) studied this question.