Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The data for medical decision analyses are often unreliable. Traditional sensitivity analysis--varying one or more probability or utility estimates from baseline values to see if the optimal strategy changes--is cumbersome if more than two values are allowed to vary concurrently. This paper describes a practical method for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, in which uncertainties in all values are considered simultaneously. The uncertainty in each probability and utility is assumed to possess a probability distribution. For ease of application we have used a parametric model that permits each distribution to be specified by two values: the baseline estimate and a bound (upper or lower) of the 95 percent confidence interval. Following multiple simulations of the decision tree in which each probability and utility is randomly assigned a value within its distribution, the following results are recorded: (a) the mean and standard deviation of the expected utility of each strategy; (b) the frequency with which each strategy is optimal; (c) the frequency with which each strategy "buys" or "costs" a specified amount of utility relative to the remaining strategies. As illustrated by an application to a previously published decision analysis, this technique is easy to use and can be a valuable addition to the armamentarium of the decision analyst.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter M. Doubilet
Colin B. Begg
Milton C. Weinstein
Medical Decision Making
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Doubilet et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a014962e4618ba4162dda19 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8500500205