Enhanced tracking and follow-up by community health workers increased the completion of medical follow-up visits within 90 days compared to usual care (65.1% vs 46.7%; P=.001).
RCT (n=421)
Yes
Effect estimate: Relative increase 39.4% (95% CI 14%-71%)
Absolute Event Rate: 65.1% vs 46.7%
p-value: p=.001
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effectiveness of enhanced tracking and follow-up services provided by community health workers in promoting medical follow-up of persons whose elevated blood pressures were detected during blood pressure measurement at urban community sites. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 421 participants received either enhanced or usual referrals to care. Participants were 18 years or older, were either Black or White, and had blood pressure greater than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg and income equal to or less than 200% of poverty. The primary outcome measure was completion of a medical follow-up visit within 90 days of referral. RESULTS: The enhanced intervention increased follow-up by 39.4% (95% confidence interval CI = 14%, 71%; P = .001) relative to usual care. Follow-up visits were completed by 65.1% of participants in the intervention group, compared with 46.7% of those in the usual-care group. The number needed to treat was 5 clients (95% CI = 3, 13) per additional follow-up visit realized. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced tracking and outreach increased the proportion of persons with elevated blood pressure detected during community measurement who followed up with medical care.
KRIEGER et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Elevated blood pressure (n=421). Enhanced tracking and follow-up services by community health workers vs. Usual care (usual referrals) was evaluated on Completion of a medical follow-up visit within 90 days of referral (Relative increase 39.4%, 95% CI 14%-71%, p=.001). Enhanced tracking and follow-up by community health workers increased the completion of medical follow-up visits within 90 days compared to usual care (65.1% vs 46.7%; P=.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: