Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Biological denitrification is affected by many environmental factors that control the amount of N 2 and N 2 O entering the atmosphere. This study was conducted to measure the effect of water‐filled pore space (WFPS), available C, and soil NO 3 concentration on total denitrification (N 2 + N 2 O), using acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) inhibition, and to ascertain if denitrification could be estimated from N 2 O measurements in the field using an average N 2 /N 2 O ratio. Repacked cores of four benchmark soils were brought to 60, 75, and 90% WFPS by applying treatments of glucose‐C (0, 180, and 360 kg ha −1 ) and NO 3 ‐N (0, 50, and 100 kg ha −1 ). The cores were incubated at 25°C, with and without 100 mL C 2 H 2 L −1 , for 5 d during which daily gas samples of the headspace were analyzed for N 2 O and CO 2 . Total N loss due to denitrification generally increased as soil texture became finer and WFPS increased. The only exception to this was the C‐amended sand, where N losses up to 26 and 66% were recorded at 60 and 75% WFPS, respectively. Denitrification rates at high N concentrations were quite small in the absence of an available C source but increased with increasing available C (glucose). The N 2 /N 2 O ratio generally increased with time of incubation after the initial treatment application. The largest ratios (up to 549) were found at the highest available C rate and generally at the highest soil water content. The presence of high NO 3 concentrations apparently inhibited the conversion of N 2 O to N 2 , resulting in lower N 2 /N 2 O ratios. Using an average N 2 /N 2 O ratio for estimation of denitrification from N 2 O field measurements cannot be recommended because of the variation in this ratio due to the many environmental factors altered by field management that influence denitrification and the relative production of N 2 and N 2 O.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
K. L. Weier
Queensland University of Technology
J. W. Doran
Lucid Technologies (United States)
J. F. Power
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Weier et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10787f8090e499da613849 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010013x