Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Hot air and microwave-assisted hot air drying of apples (Golden delicious), strawberries (Fragaria vesca cv. Elsanta), tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentom var. Roma), and mushrooms (A. bisporus) were performed in a commercial microwave oven that had been modified to incorporate a hot air dryer. The same microwave power intensity was used in all experiments. We investigated the effect of the above-stated methods on the structural, optical, mechanical, and rehydration characteristics of dried samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate the structural damage associated with two drying methods. The drying rate was significantly affected by microwave energy; therefore, drying time was reduced by 80, 70, 74, and 66%, respectively for apples, strawberries, tomatoes, and mushrooms, respectively. Specific volume, particle density, and porosity variation were estimated using models proposed in the literature. Some structural damage occurred, as observed in SEM micrographs. Optical, mechanical, and rehydration parameters were enhanced by microwave treatment for apples, strawberries, and tomatoes. However, negative effects were observed in the case of mushrooms. Keywords: AppleDrying characteristicsHot air–assisted microwaveHot air dryingMushroomQuality attributesStrawberryTomato Notes ∗There is no significance difference between the numbers with the same letter at (p < 0.05). ∗∗Numbers in parentheses are the determination coefficients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gholam Reza Askari
Isfahan University of Technology
Zahra Emam‐Djomeh
University of Tehran
Mohammad Mousavi
University of Applied Science and Technology
Drying Technology
University of Tehran
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Askari et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa3de00ab073a278389f3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930902988106
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: