Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: This study describes U. S. hospitalizations with diagnostic codes indicating elder mistreatment (EM). METHOD: Using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project (HCUP), inpatient stays coded with diagnoses of adult abuse and/or neglect are compared with stays of other hospitalized adults age 60 and older. RESULTS: Few hospitalizations (< 0. 02%) were coded with EM diagnoses in 2003. Compared to other hospitalizations of older adults, patients with EM codes were twice as likely to be women (OR = 2. 12, 95% CI = 1. 63-2. 75), significantly more likely to be emergency department admissions (78. 0% vs. 56. 8%, p <. 0001), and, on average, more likely to have longer stays (7. 0 vs. 5. 6 days, p = 0. 01). Patients with EM codes were also three to four times more likely to be discharged to a facility such as a nursing home rather than "routinely" discharged (i. e. , to home or self-care) (OR = 3. 66, 95% CI = 2. 92-4. 59). Elder mistreatment-coded hospitalizations compared to all other hospitalizations had on average lower total charges (21, 479 vs. 25, 127, p <. 001), with neglect cases having the highest charges in 2003 (29, 389). IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge about EM is often likened to the "tip of the iceberg. " Our study contributes to "mapping the EM iceberg"; however, findings based on diagnostic codes are limited and should not be used to minimize the problem of EM. With the so-called graying of America, training is needed in recognizing EM along with research to improve our nation's response to the mistreatment of our elderly population.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sue Rovi
Ping-Hsin Chen
Marielos Vega
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
View
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Howard University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rovi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1954f1fa25ab5db6d96195 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08946560903005109