Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A systematic review may encompass both odds ratios and mean differences in continuous outcomes. A separate meta-analysis of each type of outcome results in loss of information and may be misleading. It is shown that a ln(odds ratio) can be converted to effect size by dividing by 1.81. The validity of effect size, the estimate of interest divided by the residual standard deviation, depends on comparable variation across studies. If researchers routinely report residual standard deviation, any subsequent review can combine both odds ratios and effect sizes in a single meta-analysis when this is justified.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
S Chinn (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7f5b43b601d7be3ae371a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3127::aid-sim784>3.0.co;2-m
S Chinn
Imperial College London
Statistics in Medicine
King's College London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...