Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In the problem of regions, we wish to know which one of a discrete set of possibilities applies to a continuous parameter vector. This problem arises in the following way: we compute a descriptive statistic from a set of data, notice an interesting feature and wish to assign a confidence level to that feature. For example, we compute a density estimate and notice that the estimate is bimodal. What confidence can we assign to bimodality? A natural way to measure confidence is via the bootstrap: we compute our descriptive statistic on a large number of bootstrap data sets and record the proportion of times that the feature appears. This seems like a plausible measure of confidence for the feature. The paper studies the construction of such confidence values and examines to what extent they approximate frequentist p-values and Bayesian a posteriori probabilities. We derive more accurate confidence levels using both frequentist and objective Bayesian approaches. The methods are illustrated with a number of examples, including polynomial model selection and estimating the number of modes of a density.
Efron et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: