Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Williams or McKenzie protocol of treatment was more effective in both decreasing pain and hastening the return of pain-free range of lumbar spine movement. Twenty-two subjects underwent an initial evaluation which involved six measurements: subjective pain, comfortable sitting time, forward flexion, right and left lateral flexion, and straight leg raise. Subjects required to perform Williams' protocol were assigned accordingly, while those referred as "evaluate and treat" were placed in the McKenzie group. Following the completion of treatment, a second evaluation was performed taking the same six measurements. A comparison of the improvement scores of the two groups indicated that those receiving the McKenzie protocol improved to a significantly (P < 0.001) greater extent than did the subjects in the Williams group, and that these changes came about in a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter period of time.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1984;6(2):130-139.
Ponte et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: