Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article describes recent research in subjective usability measurement at IBM, focused on evaluating the psychometric properties of questionnaires designed for use in scenario‐based usability evaluation. The questionnaires address evaluation at both a global overall system level and at a more detailed scenario level. The primary goals of this article are to (a) discuss the psychometric characteristics of IBM questionnaires that measure user satisfaction with computer system usability, and (b) provide the questionnaires, with administration and scoring instructions. For scenario‐level measurement, the 3‐item After‐Scenario Questionnaire (ASQ) has excellent internal consistency, with coefficient alphas across a set of scenarios ranging from .90 to .96. For more global assessment, the Post‐Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) also has excellent internal consistency, with an overall coefficient alpha of .97. Preliminary principal factor analysis of 48 PSSUQ questionnaires suggested the presence of three factors named, after varimax rotation, System Usefulness, Information Quality, and Interface Quality, with corresponding coefficient alphas of .96, .91, and .91. Evaluation of 377 PSSUQ questionnaires (modified to allow mailing to respondents in their offices and referred to as the Computer System Usability Questionnaire, or CSUQ) confirmed the structure of the preliminary principal factor analysis. Consequently, usability practitioners can use these questionnaires to help them measure users’ satisfaction with the usability of computer systems in the context of scenario‐based usability studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James R. Lewis
Royal Alexandra Hospital
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
IBM (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James R. Lewis (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f50e135aa7d1193972547e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: