The activation-recovery interval calculated from the intracardiac unipolar electrogram accurately represented the local effective refractory period in both the control state and under treatment with dl-sotalol.
Observational (n=19)
No
Does the activation-recovery interval (ARI) calculated from intracardiac unipolar electrograms accurately represent the local effective refractory period (ERP) in humans with and without dl-sotalol treatment?
The activation-recovery interval calculated from intracardiac unipolar electrograms accurately represents the local effective refractory period in the human right ventricle, validating its use for assessing local refractoriness.
In experimental studies and/or human body surface mapping, the activation-recovery interval (ARI) is used as a parameter to estimate local repolarization. However, it has not been clarified whether the ARI calculated from the intracardiac unipolar electrogram of humans reasonably represents the local effective refractory period (ERP). Measurement of ARIs at multiple ventricular sites can be helpful in assessing the dispersion of ventricular refractoriness of humans, so we examined the relationship between ERP and ARI in the control state and under treatment with dl-sotalol during clinical electrophysiologic studies (EPS). Of 19 patients, an EPS was performed in the control state in 12 and during treatment with dl-sotalol in the other 7. Quadripolar electrode catheters with an interelectrode distance of 5 mm were placed at the right atrium and in the right ventricle. Using atrial pacing, the heart rate was increased incrementally by 10 beats/min, and ERP and ARI were measured for each pacing rate. The ERP at the right ventricle was measured by single extrastimulation between the first and third distal electrodes of the catheter in the right ventricle, and the ARI was calculated from the second distal unipolar electrode of the same catheter as the interval between the minimum derivative of the intrinsic deflection and the maximum derivative of the T wave. In all patients, the unipolar electrogram was stable during the entire EPS, and 83 data points in the control group and 50 in the dl-sotalol group were analyzed. At each pacing rate, the beat-to-beat difference of ARI was less than 10 ms. As the atrial pacing rate increased, the ERP and ARI were progressively shortened, and linear regression analysis revealed an excellent correlation between ERP and ARI. At the same pacing rate, the ERP and ARI in the dl-sotalol group were longer than those in the control group, but no difference was observed in the slope (close to 1.0) and in the intercept of the regression lines between ERP and ARI. In the human ventricle, the ARI calculated from the intracardiac unipolar electrogram represents the local ERP both in the control state and under treatment with dl-sotalol. The ARI can be used as a parameter of local refractoriness and used to study the distribution of refractoriness in the human ventricle.
Chinushi et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Patients undergoing clinical electrophysiologic studies (n=19). dl-sotalol vs. Control (no antiarrhythmic medication) was evaluated on Correlation between effective refractory period (ERP) and activation-recovery interval (ARI). The activation-recovery interval calculated from the intracardiac unipolar electrogram accurately represented the local effective refractory period in both the control state and under treatment with dl-sotalol.