Ventricular or atrioventricular pacing and isoproterenol impaired myocardial efficiency, whereas atrial pacing or right interganglionic nerve stimulation increased heart rate without altering efficiency.
Does the method of increasing heart rate (pacing, sympathetic stimulation, or isoproterenol) affect myocardial function and oxygen utilization in an open-chest dog model?
In an animal model, increasing heart rate via atrial pacing preserves myocardial efficiency, whereas ventricular pacing, atrioventricular pacing, or isoproterenol impairs it.
The effects of increasing heart rate by six different methods on cardiac function were investigated in 17 open-chest anesthetized dogs. Heart rate was increased approximately 30% by (1) right interganglionic nerve stimulation, (2) atrial pacing, (3) ventricular pacing, (4) atrioventricular sequential pacing, (5) right stellate ganglion stimulation, and (6) isoproterenol administration. During heart rate increases induced by atrial pacing left ventricular intramyocardial pressure, coronary blood flow, oxygen delivery per unit of myocardial oxygen consumption, and myocardial efficiency were unchanged. Ventricular pacing reduced left ventricular cavity and septal intramyocardial pressure, while circumflex coronary flow increased, resulting in reduced oxygen delivery relative to myocardial oxygen consumption. Similarly, atrioventricular sequential pacing increased circumflex coronary artery flow and myocardial oxygen consumption, and decreased septal intramyocardial pressure and oxygen delivery per unit of myocardial oxygen consumption. Right stellate ganglion stimulation and isoproterenol increased left anterior descending and circumflex coronary artery blood flow, intramyocardial pressure, and myocardial oxygen consumption. Estimated myocardial efficiency (left ventricle) was decreased by ventricular pacing and isoproterenol, and was unchanged by atrial pacing and right interganglionic nerve stimulation. Increases in heart rate induced by right interganglionic nerve stimulation did not alter myocardial oxygen consumption, or the index of cardiac efficiency. It is concluded that augmentation of heart rate by either ventricular or atrioventricular pacing impairs myocardial function so that there is a decrease of left ventricular efficiency and isoproterenol augments chronotropism and myocardial force relative to cardiac external work so there is a reduction in cardiac efficiency. In contrast, atrial pacing or right interganglionic nerve stimulation augments chronotropism such that myocardial oxygen consumption and efficiency are unchanged.
Gardner et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Methods to increase heart rate (nerve stimulation, pacing, isoproterenol) was evaluated on Cardiac function, myocardial oxygen consumption, and efficiency. Ventricular or atrioventricular pacing and isoproterenol impaired myocardial efficiency, whereas atrial pacing or right interganglionic nerve stimulation increased heart rate without altering efficiency.