This review summarizes current objectives and options for treating atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients, noting a lack of randomized data demonstrating a survival benefit for catheter ablation.
What are the current objectives and options for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients?
This review outlines the management strategies for atrial fibrillation in heart failure, highlighting the potential roles of catheter ablation and pacing strategies when pharmacologic options are limited by efficacy or safety.
Atrial fibrillation is common in heart failure patients and is associated with increased mortality. Pharmacologic trials have not shown any survival benefit for a rhythm control over a rate control strategy. It has been suggested that sinus rhythm is associated with a survival benefit, but that the risks of anti-arrhythmic drug treatment and poor efficacy offset the beneficial effect. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation can establish sinus rhythm without the risks of anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. Data from randomized trials demonstrating a survival benefit for patients undergoing an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation are still lacking. Ablation of the AV junction and permanent pacing remain a treatment alternative in otherwise refractory cases. Placement of a biventricular system may prevent or reduce negative consequences of chronic right ventricular pacing. Current objectives and options for treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients are reviewed.
Stevenson et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Treatment options for atrial fibrillation was evaluated. This review summarizes current objectives and options for treating atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients, noting a lack of randomized data demonstrating a survival benefit for catheter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: