Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper investigates how contract structure influences interfirm dispute resolution processes and outcomes by examining a unique dataset consisting of over 150,000 pages of documents relating to 102 business disputes. We find that the level of contract detail affects the type of dispute resolution approach that is adopted when conflict arises, and that different approaches are associated with different costs for resolving the dispute. We also find that the effect of contract choice on dispute resolution approach is moderated by the degree of coordination required in the relationship, and that the effect of dispute approach on costs is moderated by the degree of power asymmetry between the parties. Thus, even after controlling for various attributes of the exchange relationship and the dispute, the choice of contracting structure has important strategic implications. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fabrice Lumineau
University of Technology Sydney
Deepak Malhotra
University of Toledo Medical Center
Strategic Management Journal
Harvard University
University of Technology Sydney
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lumineau et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19505fc70f8b1c335821fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.890
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: