QT dispersion was significantly lower in patients with substantial viable myocardium compared to those with minimal residual viability (53±20 vs 94±24 ms, P<.0001) and predicted LV function improvement.
Observational (n=44)
Does QT dispersion correlate with the extent of viable myocardium and predict left ventricular function improvement after revascularization in patients with chronic Q-wave myocardial infarction?
QT dispersion may serve as a rapidly available, non-invasive marker of substantial myocardial viability in patients with chronic Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Absolute Event Rate: 53% vs 94%
p-value: p=<.0001
BACKGROUND: QT dispersion is lower in patients with successful thrombolysis after acute myocardial infarction, suggesting that QT dispersion may be determined by the extent of viable and scarred myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, QT dispersion was measured in a 12-lead resting ECG in 44 patients with chronic Q-wave myocardial infarction. To assess the extent of viable and scarred myocardium, all patients underwent F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, all patients had revascularization of the infarct-related artery and repeated angiography 4 months later. QT dispersion was lower (53+/-20 versus 94+/-24 ms, P or = 50% of normalized, maximum FDG uptake) than in patients with only minimal residual viability. Average FDG uptake of the infarct region and FDG defect size were significantly related to QT dispersion (r=.64, P<.0001; r=.67, P<.0001), whereas ejection fraction was not (r<.1, P=NS). QT dispersion of < or = 70 ms had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 82% to predict viable myocardium in the infarct region. QT dispersion was also lower in patients with improvement of left ventricular function 4 months after revascularization (54+/-21 versus 88+/-30 ms, P=.0003). QT dispersion of < or = 70 ms had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 71% to predict improvement of left ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: QT dispersion is determined by the amount of viable myocardium in the infarct region and may serve as a novel, rapidly available marker of substantial viability in the infarct region of patients with chronic Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Schneider et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in chronic Q-wave myocardial infarction (n=44). QT dispersion measurement vs. Minimal residual viability was evaluated on QT dispersion in patients with substantial viable myocardium versus minimal residual viability (p=<.0001). QT dispersion was significantly lower in patients with substantial viable myocardium compared to those with minimal residual viability (53±20 vs 94±24 ms, P<.0001) and predicted LV function improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: